British
Prime Minister Theresa May suffered a setback Tuesday when Britain’s supreme
court ruled the government needs Parliament’s approval to begin the process of
leaving the European Union.
"The
Supreme Court rules that the government can not trigger Article 50 without an
act of parliament authorizing it to do so," Supreme Court President David
Neuberger said Tuesday.
May had
hoped to begin the two-year process of disengaging from the EU in March by
triggering Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. After the ruling, officials at
Number 10 Downing Street said they would stick to their timetable.
With a
72-percent turnout, voters in a June referendum opted by a 4-percent margin to
leave the EU. They were asked a simple question: “Should the United Kingdom
remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?”
Challenges
ahead
The
referendum results were advisory and non-binding, however, and analysts say
that opened up the matter to further challenges, both legal and political.
In its
decision Tuesday, the court ruled that pulling out of the European Union would
mean Britain’s domestic laws would have to be changed, and therefore Parliament
would require a final say in what the laws would look like.
Britain's
Attorney General, Jeremy Wright, speaks outside the Supreme Court, in
Parliament Square, London, Jan. 24, 2017.
Britain's
Attorney General, Jeremy Wright, speaks outside the Supreme Court, in
Parliament Square, London, Jan. 24, 2017.
May’s
government argued that its executive powers entitled it to withdraw from
international agreements.
Britain’s
leading opposition Labour Party on Tuesday said it would not stand in the way
of Brexit, but instead would push to ensure that the government remained
accountable to Parliament through the whole process.
“Labour
respects the result of the referendum and the will of the British people and
will not frustrate the process for invoking Article 50,” tweeted Labour Party
leader Jeremy Corbyn. “Labour will seek to amend the Article 50 bill to prevent
the Conservatives from using Brexit to turn Britain into a bargain basement tax
haven,” referring to key provisions of May’s Brexit plan unveiled last week.
“Our prime
minister thought, shamefully, that she had a mandate to impose on Parliament
and to use her Conservative majority to take us out of Europe,” said Richard
Kirker, an anti-Brexit demonstrator. “What the judges have done, is just
reminded the government that that is not the way that this country is
governed.”
Equally
harsh words came from Brexit supporters.
“Today,
democracy is only in name only. It doesn’t exist any longer,” said Herbert
Crossman, a pro-Brexit demonstrator. “Now they got another vote against the
wishes of the people, and I think that Brexit may be derailed somehow. This is
what they were wishing for and I think they got their wish.”
In his
frustration, Crossman looks to America and invokes U.S. President Donald
Trump’s inaugural speech. “The one thing I like about what he said, ‘America
comes first, the rest can wait,’” Crossman said. “It’s a shame our spineless,
boneless MPs don’t have the same attitude toward the UK.”
Source: VOANEWS
No comments:
Post a Comment